Let's prove that matrix multiplication is associative, meaning that for any three matrices A, B, and C, we have:(AB)C = A(BC)Step-by-Step Proof:
1. Define Matrices
Let A, B, and C be three matrices of appropriate sizes for multiplication:
- Let A be an m \times n matrix.
- Let B be an n \times p matrix.
- Let C be a p \times q matrix.Thus, the product AB is an m \times p matrix, and the product BC is an n \times q matrix. Both (AB)C and A(BC) should result in an m \times q matrix.
2. Define Matrix Multiplication
For any matrices X and Y, the (i,j)-th entry of the product XY is:
(XY)_{ij} = \sum_{k} X_{ik} Y_{kj}Using this formula, we will compute both sides of the associativity equation.
3. Compute (A B) C
First, compute AB:
(AB)_{ij} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} B_{kj}Now, multiply by C to get (AB)C:
((AB)C)_{ij} = \sum_{r} (AB)_{ir} C_{rj}Substituting (AB)_{ir} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} B_{kr}, we get:
((AB)C)_{ij} = \sum_{r} \left( \sum_{k} A_{ik} B_{kr} \right) C_{rj}Rearrange the summation order:
((AB)C)_{ij} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} \left( \sum_{r} B_{kr} C_{rj} \right)4. Compute A (B C)
First, compute BC:
(BC)_{kj} = \sum_{r} B_{kr} C_{rj}Now, multiply by A to get A(BC):
(A(BC))_{ij} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} (BC)_{kj}Substituting (BC)_{kj} = \sum_{r} B_{kr} C_{rj}, we get:
(A(BC))_{ij} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} \left( \sum_{r} B_{kr} C_{rj} \right)5. Compare Both Sides
We see that:
((AB)C)_{ij} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} \left( \sum_{r} B_{kr} C_{rj} \right)(A(BC))_{ij} = \sum_{k} A_{ik} \left( \sum_{r} B_{kr} C_{rj} \right)Since these expressions are identical for all entries i, j, we conclude that:
(AB)C = A(BC)Thus, matrix multiplication is associative. ✅
ChatGPT usually formats his math-related responses in Markdown with LaTeX math notation. It is possible to ask him to format the responses using code blocks (```math ... ```)
for block math and inline math using dollar-backticks ($...$)
(KaTeX or MathJax style) - that's what I did to produce the text above. However, then the formatting in ChatGPT itself breaks, however you can copypaste it to Moera.
Shmuel Leib Melamud I wonder what would it take to support LaTeX math notation as well? I mean, what will it mean architecturally? 🙂
Comments (3)
BTW if we wrap math into
<details><summary>...</summary>...</details>
, or in<mr-spoiler-block title="spoiler! the proof...">
it is not displayed.Since the Markdown library used by moera-node does not support this syntax, one will need to write a custom parser (Eliyahu Duvidzon has an experience).
yup, I do, although if you'd not mention it right now, I'd never remember that I did that. Tigra, if understood you correctly, the math itself is formated in the same way, we're just talking about delimiting it? or do we need only additional math parser inside already delimited (inline) blocks? or both?